The public authority made the entries because of an appeal by accused Surendra Gadling and Sudhir Dhawale testing the exchange of probe from Pune Police to NIA. 

The plea challenging the transfer of probe in the Bhima Koregaon case from Pune Police to the National Investigation Agency (NIA) is a “frantic endeavor to foil the examination relating to the Bhima Koregaon instance of 2018”, the Central government submitted under the steady gaze of the Bombay High Court. 

An affidavit with that impact was recorded by the government in light of a writ appeal by Surendra Gadling and Sudhir Dhawale, two of the blamed for the situation. 

Documented by the Ministry of Home Affairs, the affidavit expressed that the  Centre had given a warning to the NIA to assume control over the examination considering the “gravity of the offense and its linked between state connection and public safety”. 

The affidavit likewise called attention to that while the underlying FIR was enrolled by the Pune Police, who additionally documented two charge sheets against nine captured accused and six fleeing accused, the State government neglected to answer to the  Centre about the booked offenses claimed for the situation. 

At the point when it was seen that the matter is “strangely grave and spread not exclusively to Pune area yet to numerous areas of India”, the Centre understood that the matter required examination by a proficient office having a skillet India presence. 

Thus, the matter was moved to NIA. 

One of the charges in the appeal was that the “move was attempted by the Central Government after many deferrals and inquisitively following BJP lost force in Maharashtra”. 

This was strongly denied by the Centre. 

The affidavit expressed that “the  Union Government alone had the obligation to ensure the sway of India and forces for setting down strategies”. 

It likewise enrolled the accompanying purposes behind the move of examination to NIA: 

• That the coordinators of the Elgar Parishad occasion (which purportedly prompted the uproars in Bhima Koregaon) were in touch with  CPI calling CPI connected to terrorism and spreading  the philosophy of Naxalism and energize unlawful exercises; 
• Presentation made to advance animosity between case bunches prompted viciousness; 
• Planned offenses were conjured;
• The intensive examination is important to uncover the bigger container India intrigue incubated by the accused. 

The Center consequently looked for excusal of the request expressing that there is no justification for the High Court to meddle.